In dual agency, which of the following is the agent not permitted to advise the seller on?

In dual agency, which of the following is the agent not permitted to advise the seller on?

• A. Pricing strategies
• B. Counteroffers
• C. Commissions
• D. Marketing strategies

Answer: (B)

In a dual agency situation, where an agent represents both the buyer and the seller, there are specific limitations on the advice the agent can provide to either party to prevent conflicts of interest. The correct option here pertains to counteroffers because, in this scenario, the agent must maintain neutrality. When acting as a dual agent, the agent’s role is to facilitate the transaction without providing preferential advice to either party on specific negotiations, such as counteroffer strategies. If an agent were to advise the seller on how to respond to a buyer’s counteroffer, it could compromise the agent’s obligation to represent the interests of both parties impartially, leading to potential conflicts. On the other hand, the agent can legally provide guidance on pricing strategies, commissions, and marketing strategies. These areas do not pose the same risks of conflict in a dual agency situation since they are pertaining to the general handling of the property and transaction rather than the specifics of negotiating offers between the two parties. Therefore, advising on counteroffers is where the limitation is most pronounced, making it the correct answer.

In a dual agency situation, where an agent represents both the buyer and the seller, there are specific limitations on the advice the agent can provide to either party to prevent conflicts of interest. The correct option here pertains to counteroffers because, in this scenario, the agent must maintain neutrality.

When acting as a dual agent, the agent’s role is to facilitate the transaction without providing preferential advice to either party on specific negotiations, such as counteroffer strategies. If an agent were to advise the seller on how to respond to a buyer’s counteroffer, it could compromise the agent’s obligation to represent the interests of both parties impartially, leading to potential conflicts.

On the other hand, the agent can legally provide guidance on pricing strategies, commissions, and marketing strategies. These areas do not pose the same risks of conflict in a dual agency situation since they are pertaining to the general handling of the property and transaction rather than the specifics of negotiating offers between the two parties. Therefore, advising on counteroffers is where the limitation is most pronounced, making it the correct answer.